SHU Lichu. Research of coal mine gas disaster risk evaluation method[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2015, 41(4): 48-51. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2015.04.013
Citation: SHU Lichu. Research of coal mine gas disaster risk evaluation method[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2015, 41(4): 48-51. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2015.04.013

Research of coal mine gas disaster risk evaluation method

More Information
  • In view of problem that gas disaster causes serious hazards to coal mine production safety, four levels and influence factors and their weights of gas disaster evaluation index system were established by applying analytic hierarchy process, and disaster evaluation model was set up. Four main factors affecting gas disaster and three consequences severity index were proposed, and quantitative method and weights of these factors were studied based on the analytic hierarchy process, so as to quantitatively reveal main causes of gas disaster. The method has great significance to prevent occurrence of coal mine gas accident.
  • Related Articles

    [1]QIAO Jiawei, TIAN Muqin. Health condition assessment of centrifugal pump based on AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2022, 48(9): 69-76. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17984
    [2]REN Zihui, CHEN Zepeng, WU Xinzhong, QIAN Xiaoyu, LI Ang. Research on health evaluation of mine ventilation system[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2021, 47(9): 70-76.. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2020120047
    [3]HOU Gang. Research on evaluation model of comprehensive condition for mine-used hydraulic support[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2019, 45(2): 96-100. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17336
    [4]HE Yaoyi. Discussion on evaluation index system and architecture of smart mine[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2017, 43(9): 16-20. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2017.09.003
    [5]CHENG Lei, ZHENG Xiaopeng, WANG Dongdong. Determination of evaluation indexes of ventilation effect and their membership functions of working face with high volume fraction gas[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2014, 40(8): 10-14. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2014.08.003
    [6]DU Dawen, WANG Baomin, ZHANG Ji. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in coal mine "six systems"[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2014, 40(4): 42-45. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2014.04.010
    [7]WU Kaixing, JIA Mingcan, ZHANG Huimi. Grey correlation analysis of coal mine safety evaluation index system based on 4M-C-I[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2014, 40(2): 84-87. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2014.02.022
    [8]ZHU Zheju. Evaluation model of information service capability of coal enterprise[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2014, 40(1): 54-58. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2014.01.015
    [9]ZOU Yi-huai, JIANG Cheng-yu, LI Chun-hui, SU Heng-yu. Evaluation of Coal Mine Safety Production Based on AHP and Fuzzy Mathematics[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2010, 36(10): 39-41.
    [10]YUAN Mei, ZHANG Yi-ping, WANG Zuo-qiang. Safety Standardization Evaluation System of Tailing Reservoir Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2010, 36(1): 52-55.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (29) PDF downloads (8) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return