Citation: | JIA Pengtao, ZHANG Jie, GUO Fengjing. Coal spontaneous combustion temperature prediction model for goaf area based on GAT-Informer[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2024,50(11):92-98, 108. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2024080022 |
The existing coal spontaneous combustion temperature prediction models only consider the temporal correlation of the monitoring data, ignoring the spatial relationships between monitoring points, and suffer from low accuracy in multi-step temperature prediction of coal spontaneous combustion. To address these issues, a coal spontaneous combustion temperature prediction model for goaf areas based on graph attention network (GAT)-Informer model (GAT-Informer) was proposed. First, the random forest regression method and Savitzky-Golay filter were used to handle outliers, missing values, and noise in the spontaneous combustion monitoring data along the goaf side, and the Z-score method was applied to standardize the data. Secondly, GAT was employed to extract spatial features from the spontaneous combustion monitoring data at multiple monitoring points. Then, the encoder of the Informer model was used to encode the data containing spatial features, utilizing a multi-head probabilistic sparse self-attention mechanism to capture long-term dependencies and temporal features among the data. The decoder interacted with the encoder through a cross-attention mechanism, combining global features extracted by the encoder with the contextual dependencies of the target sequence to generate a feature matrix, which was then fed into the fully connected layer to obtain the coal spontaneous combustion temperature prediction value. Finally, the predicted temperature value output from the Informer model was de-standardized to restore it to the original data scale, yielding the final prediction results. Experimental results showed that, compared to recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and the Informer model, the GAT-Informer model reduced the mean squared error (MSE) by an average of 15.70%, 22.15%, 25.45%, and 36.49%, respectively, and the mean absolute error (MAE) by an average of 16.01%, 14.60%, 20.30%, and 26.27%, respectively, when predicting the coal spontaneous combustion temperature at 24 time steps across six monitoring points. These results indicate that the GAT-Informer model effectively improves the multi-step prediction accuracy of coal spontaneous combustion temperature.
[1] |
邓军,白祖锦,肖旸,等. 煤自燃灾害防治技术现状与挑战[J]. 煤矿安全,2020,51(10):118-125.
DENG Jun,BAI Zujin,XIAO Yang,et al. Present situation and challenge of coal spontaneous combustion disasters prevention and control technology[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2020,51(10):118-125.
|
[2] |
杨峰峰,王海晖,苏伟伟,等. 采空区自燃危险区域判识与防控技术研究综述[J]. 煤矿安全,2023,54(6):66-75.
YANG Fengfeng,WANG Haihui,SU Weiwei,et al. Review on identification and prevention and control technology of spontaneous combustion risk area in goaf[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2023,54(6):66-75.
|
[3] |
秦波涛,仲晓星,王德明,等. 煤自燃过程特性及防治技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(1):66-99.
QIN Botao,ZHONG Xiaoxing,WANG Deming,et al. Research progress of coal spontaneous combustion process characteristics and prevention technology[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(1):66-99.
|
[4] |
谭波,邵壮壮,郭岩,等. 基于指标气体关联分析的煤自燃分级预警研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2021,31(2):33-39.
TAN Bo,SHAO Zhuangzhuang,GUO Yan,et al. Research on grading and early warning of coal spontaneous combustion based on correlation analysis of index gas[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2021,31(2):33-39.
|
[5] |
邓军,雷昌奎,曹凯,等. 采空区煤自燃预测的随机森林方法[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(10):2800-2808.
DENG Jun,LEI Changkui,CAO Kai,et al. Random forest method for predicting coal spontaneous combustion in gob[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(10):2800-2808.
|
[6] |
王怡,谢军,任广意. 采空区遗煤自然发火的指标气体研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发,2020,40(10):118-122.
WANG Yi,XIE Jun,REN Guangyi. Study on index gas in spontaneous combustion of goaf residual coal[J]. Mining Research and Development,2020,40(10):118-122.
|
[7] |
文虎,赵向涛,王伟峰,等. 不同煤体自燃指标性气体函数模型特征分析[J]. 煤炭转化,2020,43(1):16-25.
WEN Hu,ZHAO Xiangtao,WANG Weifeng,et al. Analysis on characteristics of indicator gases of spontaneous combustion of different coals[J]. Coal Conversion,2020,43(1):16-25.
|
[8] |
赵琳琳,温国锋,邵良杉. 不均衡数据下的采空区煤自燃PCA−AdaBoost预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2018,28(3):74-78.
ZHAO Linlin,WEN Guofeng,SHAO Liangshan. PCA−AdaBoost model for predicting coal spontaneous combustion in caving zone with imbalanced data[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2018,28(3):74-78.
|
[9] |
昝军才,魏成才,蒋可娟,等. 基于BP神经网络的煤自燃温度预测研究[J]. 煤炭工程,2019,51(10):113-117.
ZAN Juncai,WEI Chengcai,JIANG Kejuan,et al. Prediction of coal spontaneous combustion temperature based on BP neural network[J]. Coal Engineering,2019,51(10):113-117.
|
[10] |
郑学召,李梦涵,张嬿妮,等. 基于随机森林算法的煤自燃温度预测模型研究[J]. 工矿自动化,2021,47(5):58-64.
ZHENG Xuezhao,LI Menghan,ZHANG Yanni,et al. Research on the prediction model of coal spontaneous combustion temperature based on random forest algorithm[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2021,47(5):58-64.
|
[11] |
汪伟,梁然,祁云,等. 基于PSO−BPNN的煤自燃危险性预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2023,33(7):127-132.
WANG Wei,LIANG Ran,QI Yun,et al. Prediction model of coal spontaneous combustion risk based on PSO-BPNN[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2023,33(7):127-132.
|
[12] |
贾澎涛,林开义,郭风景. 基于PSO−SRU深度神经网络的煤自燃温度预测模型[J]. 工矿自动化,2022,48(4):105-113.
JIA Pengtao,LIN Kaiyi,GUO Fengjing. A temperature prediction model for coal spontaneous combustion based on PSO-SRU deep artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2022,48(4):105-113.
|
[13] |
刘永立,刘晓伟,王海涛. 基于LSTM神经网络的煤矿火灾预测[J]. 黑龙江科技大学学报,2023,33(1):1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7262.2023.01.001
LIU Yongli,LIU Xiaowei,WANG Haitao. Coal mine fire prediction based on LSTM neural network[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology,2023,33(1):1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7262.2023.01.001
|
[14] |
王斌,贾澎涛,郭风景,等. 基于多特征融合的煤自燃温度深度预测模型[J]. 中国矿业,2024,33(2):84-90. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.20230635
WANG Bin,JIA Pengtao,GUO Fengjing,et al. Deep prediction model of coal spontaneous combustion temperature based on multi-feature fusion[J]. China Mining Magazine,2024,33(2):84-90. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.20230635
|
[15] |
王树斌,王旭,闫世平,等. 基于Transformer的矿井内因火灾时间序列预测方法[J]. 工矿自动化,2024,50(3):65-70,91.
WANG Shubin,WANG Xu,YAN Shiping,et al. Transformer based time series prediction method for mine internal caused fire[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2024,50(3):65-70,91.
|
[16] |
李艳昌,张连超,陶华焕. 铁北煤矿褐煤自燃预测函数模型研究[J]. 工业安全与环保,2024,50(6):28-31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2024.06.006
LI Yanchang,ZHANG Lianchao,TAO Huahuan. Study on prediction function model of lignite spontaneous combustion in Tiebei Coal Mine[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection,2024,50(6):28-31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2024.06.006
|
[17] |
LI Pengfei,ZHANG Tong,JIN Yantao. A spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for air quality prediction[J]. Sustainability,2023,15(9):7624. DOI: 10.3390/su15097624
|
[18] |
程子均,马六章,张翼翔. 基于LSTM−FC的瓦斯浓度时空分布预测[J]. 计算机工程与应用,2020,56(16):258-264. DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2005-0250
CHENG Zijun,MA Liuzhang,ZHANG Yixiang. Prediction of spatiotemporal distribution of gas concentration based on LSTM-FC model[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications,2020,56(16):258-264. DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2005-0250
|
[19] |
VELIČKOVIĆ P,CUCURULL G,CASANOVA A,et al. Graph attention networks[EB/OL]. [2024-07-22]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10903v3.
|
[20] |
ZHOU Haoyi,ZHANG Shanghang,PENG Jieqi,et al. Informer:beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting[C]. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,Vancouve,2021:11106-11115.
|
[21] |
王苏健,贾澎涛,金声尧. 基于随机森林回归的围岩应力插值方法[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2021,41(2):274-281.
WANG Sujian,JIA Pengtao,JIN Shengyao. An interpolation method of surrounding rock stress based on random forest regression[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2021,41(2):274-281.
|
[22] |
余琼芳,唐高峰,王联港. 基于改进Informer的综采工作面顶板压力多步长预测[J]. 矿业研究与开发,2023,43(11):61-67.
YU Qiongfang,TANG Gaofeng,WANG Liangang. Multi-step prediction of roof pressure of comprehensive mining face based on the improved informer[J]. Mining Research and Development,2023,43(11):61-67.
|