GAO Jiaming, XIA Yongxue, YANG Guangyu, CHEN Xuehui. The stress distribution of coal and rock mass and the risk evaluation of rock burst in the composite structure area[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2021, 47(3): 14-19. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17686
Citation: GAO Jiaming, XIA Yongxue, YANG Guangyu, CHEN Xuehui. The stress distribution of coal and rock mass and the risk evaluation of rock burst in the composite structure area[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2021, 47(3): 14-19. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17686

The stress distribution of coal and rock mass and the risk evaluation of rock burst in the composite structure area

More Information
  • The abnormal concentration of stress in the structure area of the working face is closely related to the rock burst. Based on the good correlation between the wave velocity and stress of the coal and rock mass, the seismic wave CT detection technology is widely used in the evaluation and warning of the risk of rock burst. However, the existing researches are mainly focused on simple conditions or single structure area. The composite structure area formed by multiple geological structures has not been discussed. Taking the 2305 fully mechanized working face of a mine in Shandong as an example, in the context of the concentration of microseismic events in the composite structure area and the occurrence of rock bursts, the seismic wave CT detection technology is used to obtain the stress distribution of coal and rock mass in the structure area and the characteristic index c including speed and speed gradient of seismic wave is introduced to analyze the stress distribution characteristics and the risk of rock burst. The research results show that: ① The concentration of microseismic events is related to adjacent structures. The concentrated areas can be divided into single or composite areas according to the number of structures, and can be divided into strongly or weakly disturbed areas according to the degree of disturbance. ② The strongly disturbed area composite structure area has the highest static stress concentration, and the weakly disturbed single structure area has the lowest stress concentration. The stress increase level of the fault single structure area is positively correlated with the degree of disturbance. The syncline in the weakly disturbed composite structure area has a significantly higher stress than the fault area. ③ The static stress concentration of the surrounding rock in the structure area is the main cause of intense surrounding rock activity. Based on the static load of surrounding rock and the dynamic load increment under the influence of mining, the risk of rock burst in the concentrated area of different microseismic events can be obtained.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHU Hongwei, KANG Zhongquan, SONG Binglin, FENG Panfei. Damage characteristics and support optimization of roadway surrounding rock in near-vertical coal seams under combined dynamic and static loads[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2025, 51(2): 138-147. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2024120019
    [2]GAO Lijun, JIN Fadong, LIANG Dongyu, YANG Wenbin, TANG Yepeng, WANG Tong. Study on the stress distribution of surrounding rock and the inclination effect of gangue filling features in steeply dipping mining sites[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2024, 50(3): 142-150. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2023100064
    [3]FU Yukai, WANG Tao, SUN Zhiyong, YUE Yanpeng. Composite grouting reinforcement technology for deep roadway surrounding rock[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2022, 48(7): 105-112. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022040063
    [4]YANG Wei, LAN Shirui, LI Zhenlei, ZHANG Chuanjiu, LI Hongping, ZHONG Taoping, SONG Dazhao, ZHOU Chao. Analysis of coal pillar rock burst appearance in multi-seam mining with thick and hard roof[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2022, 48(2): 70-76. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2021050071
    [5]LI Yan, GAO Zhaoning, CHEN Dengguo, GU Wenwei. Stability analysis of roadway surrounding rock under the action of bolt bearing layer[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2021, 47(4): 85-91. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2020120071
    [6]LI Guiming, ZHOU Chao, WANG Xiaodong. Research on influence of the maximum principal stress direction on stability of roadway surrounding rock[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2019, 45(10): 38-42. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2019040058
    [7]LU Nannan, CHEN Yongheng, MA Zhanguo, SUN Yanjing, JING Hongwen. Research on informatization technology for roadway surrounding rock structure monitoring in deep underground[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2019, 45(6): 1-9. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17406
    [8]ZHU Liu. Research of deformation of roadway surrounding rock under effect of high horizontal stress in Gaojiapu Coal Mine[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2017, 43(11): 58-62. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2017.11.012
    [9]LI Huwei, FANG Xinqiu, LIANG Minfu, XUE Guangzhe. Research on monitoring technology of surrounding rock stress based on fiber grating[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2015, 41(11): 17-20. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2015.11.005
    [10]ZHAO Qing-tao, GAO Jin-hai, CHENG Bao-ju. Numerical Simulation Research of Stability of Surrounding Rock of Inclined Soft Rock Roadway under Effect of Different Horizontal Stresses[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2011, 37(5): 41-44.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 夏玉成,孙学阳,苗霖田,郭晨,杜荣军. 智能时代的矿井地质工作展望——矿井开采智能地质保障技术体系架构. 煤田地质与勘探. 2025(01): 64-76 .
    2. 万晓,肖自义,袁健博,刘志刚,尚文政,朱铁景,路亚军. 深部地堑构造区域沿空工作面冲击地压分析及防治措施. 现代矿业. 2024(01): 111-114+118 .
    3. 贾海宾,刘爱鑫,张斌,付相超,蔡武. 基于多因素耦合量化表征模型的冲击危险区域划分. 工矿自动化. 2024(07): 47-54+97 . 本站查看
    4. 孟祥甜. 悬顶采空区下煤层开采压架危险性评估及勘探技术. 煤炭技术. 2023(01): 197-202 .
    5. 任仰辉. 基于CT扫描的煤岩试件破坏加载速率效应数值模拟研究. 煤炭科技. 2022(03): 1-6 .
    6. 闫耀东,潘俊锋,席国军,焦彪,史星. 综放开采见方构造区冲击危险性分析及防治研究. 工矿自动化. 2021(10): 7-13 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (150) PDF downloads (22) Cited by(8)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return