综掘工作面全断面风幕降尘技术与参数优化研究

  • 摘要: 针对传统通风降尘方法在掘进机移动、支护作业及主进风流扰动下难以维持稳定的阻隔空间、降尘效率低、粉尘扩散区域大等问题,提出一种全断面风幕降尘装置以提高降尘效率。以陕北某矿2201辅助运输掘进巷为工程背景,采用数值模拟方法,对传统正压通风、单风幕控尘和全断面风幕降尘三种模式下的粉尘分布规律和降尘效率进行了对比分析;基于多因素多水平实验分析了负压风筒直径、风幕位置、风幕射流速度、正压风筒距迎头距离和压抽比等关键参数对降尘效率的影响;通过极差分析法结合司机位置与呼吸带不同因素影响程度,得出了最优降尘方案。结果表明,全断面风幕可通过三面环绕射流形成连续气动屏障,将高浓度粉尘限制在迎头控制区并引导至负压吸风口;各因素对呼吸带粉尘浓度的影响程度依次为风幕射流速度、风幕位置、压抽比、负压风筒直径和正压风筒距迎头距离;最优参数组合为负压风筒直径1.2 m、风幕距迎头5 m、风幕射流速度12 m/s、正压风筒距迎头11 m、压抽比1:1.1;在最佳配置方案下,风幕外侧工作区域粉尘浓度平均值由553.44 mg/m3降至90.11 mg/m3,平均降尘效率达到83.72%。该方案为全断面风幕降尘技术的现场实施提供了可量化的参数依据。

     

    Abstract: To address issues with traditional ventilation dust control methods—such as difficulty maintaining a stable barrier space,low dust removal efficiency,and large dust dispersion areas due to the movement of roadheaders,support operations, and disturbances in the main airflow—a full-section air curtain dust removal device has been proposed to improve dust control efficiency. Using the 2201 auxiliary transport heading in a northern Shaanxi mine as the engineering background, a numerical simulation method was employed to compare and analyze dust distribution and removal efficiency under three models: traditional positive pressure ventilation, single air curtain dust control, and full-section air curtain dust removal. Based on multi-factor, multi-level experiments, the effects of key parameters such as negative pressure duct diameter, air curtain position, air curtain jet velocity, distance of the positive pressure duct from the heading, and pressure-to-suction ratio on dust removal efficiency were analyzed. Using range analysis combined with the influence degree of factors on the driver’s position and breathing zone, the optimal dust removal scheme was determined. Results showed that the full-section air curtain could form a continuous aerodynamic barrier with three-sided surrounding jets, limiting high-concentration dust to the heading control area and directing it toward the negative pressure exhaust outlet; the factors affecting dust concentration in the breathing zone were in order: air curtain jet velocity, air curtain position, pressure-to-suction ratio, negative pressure duct diameter, and distance of the positive pressure duct from the heading. The optimal parameter combination was a negative pressure duct diameter of 1.2 m, air curtain positioned 5 m from the heading, air curtain jet velocity of 12 m/s, positive pressure duct 11 m from the heading, and a pressure-to-suction ratio of 1:1.1.Under this best configuration, the average dust concentration in the working area outside the air curtain dropped from 553.44 mg/m3 to 90.11 mg/m3, with an average dust removal efficiency of 83.72%. This scheme provides quantifiable parameter guidance for the field implementation of full-section air curtain dust removal technology.

     

/

返回文章
返回