巨厚煤层开采微震响应特征及地表沉陷演化规律研究

Study on microseismic response characteristics and surface subsidence evolution in extremely thick coal seam mining

  • 摘要: 巨厚煤层开采形成的大空间造成上覆岩层运动过程及矿压显现复杂,导致现场微震响应特征与地表沉陷演化规律不清晰。针对上述问题,以国家能源集团国源电力有限公司准东二矿巨厚煤层为研究对象,基于现场实测分析巨厚煤层采动影响下微震响应特征及地表沉陷演化规律,并揭示二者与回采速度的关联性。研究结果表明:① 巨厚煤层采动影响下微震事件分布范围广,不同能级微震事件超前工作面分布范围达20倍采厚,在工作面垂向集中分布范围为5.5倍采厚,在工作面两侧集中分布范围达2.8倍采厚。② 中等能级微震事件在所有微震事件中占比最大,且不同关键层区域微震事件呈“低层位低能级、高层位高能级”分布特征。③ 地表下沉量在工作面倾向上呈“漏斗型”分布形态,最大下沉量约为1/2采厚;不同回采阶段最大下沉量位置均位于工作面中部区域,相较工作面位置具有“滞后性”特征。④ 回采速度与微震及地表沉陷演化具有较强关联性,随着回采速度增加,微震事件在工作面两侧分布范围呈逐渐减小趋势,在工作面煤层上方分布范围逐渐增大,微震事件能量、频次及地表位移变化速率均呈非线性增加趋势。

     

    Abstract: The large space formed by the mining of extremely thick coal seams makes the movement process of overlying strata and the manifestation of mine pressure complex, resulting in unclear characteristics of field microseismic responses and surface subsidence evolution patterns. To address these problems, the extremely thick coal seam of the Zhundong No. 2 Mine of CHN Energy Guoyuan Power Co., Ltd. was selected as the research object. Based on field measurements and analyses, the study investigated the characteristics of microseismic responses and the evolution pattern of surface subsidence under the influence of mining activities in extremely thick coal seams, and revealed their correlation with the mining rate. The results showed that: ① under the influence of mining in extremely thick coal seams, the distribution range of microseismic events was wide. The distribution range ahead of the working face for microseismic events of different energy levels reached up to 20 times the mining thickness, the concentrated vertical distribution range above the working face was about 5.5 times the mining thickness, and the concentrated distribution range on both sides of the working face reached 2.8 times the mining thickness. ② Medium-energy microseismic events accounted for the largest proportion among all events, and the microseismic events in different key strata showed a distribution pattern of "low-energy events at lower horizons and high-energy events at higher horizons". ③ The surface subsidence exhibited a "funnel-shaped" distribution along the inclination direction of the working face, with the maximum subsidence being approximately half of the mining thickness. During different mining stages, the maximum subsidence position was always located in the middle region of the working face and showed a "lagging" feature relative to the working face position. ④ The mining rate was strongly correlated with the evolution of microseismic activity and surface subsidence. As the mining rate increased, the distribution range of microseismic events on both sides of the working face gradually decreased, while that above the coal seam expanded. Meanwhile, the energy and frequency of microseismic events, as well as the variation rate of surface displacement, all showed nonlinear increasing trends.

     

/

返回文章
返回