Comparative study on stress acoustic emission changes in damage and failure of raw coal and briquette
-
摘要: 在研究声发射特征与煤样和断裂的关系时，原煤和型煤都可用作实验样本。大多煤层材质较软，制造标准的原煤试样较为困难，因此使用型煤作为研究样本的实验较普遍，但型煤改变了煤的原始结构，影响了其物理和力学性质，使用型煤替代原煤作为实验样本的适用性一直是学术界讨论的焦点。此外，目前对于原煤和型煤在假三轴压缩实验中表现出的声发射特征差异的研究相对有限。针对上述问题，开展了原煤和型煤假三轴压缩声发射实验，从力学性能、断裂模式和声发射时空演化、频带能量分布、非线性特征等方面着重讨论和分析。结果表明：加载过程中释放的声发射能量和峰值应力总能量与煤样强度密切相关，原煤主要为剪切和拉伸混合破坏模式，型煤主要为拉伸轴裂破坏模式；煤样的声发射位置分别对应其宏观破裂形态，但发生时间和空间分布不同；在峰前加载阶段，原煤的声发射信号相对较少，而型煤的声发射响应剧烈，并在峰值应力时刻达到最大值；通过小波包分析得到型煤的声发射频带能量分布范围小于原煤，原煤的声发射信号频率主要集中在10～120 kHz，而型煤的声发射信号仅在0～100 kHz频率范围内活跃，说明型煤的微破裂规模大于原煤；原煤和型煤的波形能量90%活跃在0～150 kHz；当加载试样接近失稳破坏时，即加载应力为峰值应力的99%左右时，原煤和型煤声发射信号的Hurst指数均大于0.5，表明声发射时间序列与加载过程具有长期相关性。Abstract: When studying the relationship between acoustic emission features and coal samples and fractures, both raw coal and briquette can be used as experimental samples. Most coal seams have soft materials, making it difficult to manufacture standard raw coal samples. Therefore, it is common to use briquettes as research samples in experiments. However, coal briquettes change the original structure of coal, affecting its physical and mechanical properties. The applicability of using briquettes instead of raw coal as experimental samples has always been a focus of academic discussion. And currently, there is relatively limited research on the differences in acoustic emission features between raw coal and briquette in pseudo triaxial compression experiments. In order to solve the above problems, pseudo triaxial compression acoustic emission experiments are conducted on raw coal and briquette, with a focus on discussing and analyzing mechanical properties, fracture modes, spatiotemporal evolution of acoustic emission, frequency band energy distribution, nonlinear features, and other aspects. The results show that the acoustic emission energy released during the loading process and the total peak stress energy are closely related to the strength of the coal sample. The raw coal mainly exhibits a mixed failure mode of shear and tension, while the briquette mainly exhibits a tensile axial crack failure mode. The acoustic emission positions of coal samples correspond to their macroscopic fracture morphology, but their occurrence time and spatial distribution are different. In the pre peak loading stage, the acoustic emission signal of raw coal is relatively small, while the acoustic emission response of briquette is intense and reaches its maximum value at the peak stress moment. Through wavelet packet analysis, it is found that the energy distribution of the acoustic emission frequency band of briquette is smaller than that of raw coal. The acoustic emission signals of raw coal are mainly concentrated in the frequency range of 10-120 kHz, while the acoustic emission signals of briquette only jump in the frequency range of 0-100 kHz, indicating that the micro fracture scale of briquette is larger than that of raw coal. 90% of the waveform energy of raw coal and briquette is active at 0-150 kHz. When the loaded sample approaches instability failure, i.e. around 99% of the peak stress, the Hurst index of the acoustic emission signals of raw coal and briquette are both greater than 0.5. It indicates a long-term correlation between the acoustic emission time series and the loading process.
-
图 1 假三轴压缩声发射实验装置
Figure 1. Pseudo triaxial compression acoustic emission experimental device
图 8 原煤和型煤声发射信号的时间序列特征
Figure 8. Time series characterization of acoustic emission signals from raw coal and briquette
图 9 不同应力水平下原煤和型煤声发射的空间分布和能量
Figure 9. Spatial distribution and energy of AE from raw coal and briquette at different stress levels
图 11 原煤和型煤在σ/σc=99%时的波形能量比分布
Figure 11. Distribution of waveform energy ratios of raw coal and briquette at σ/σc=99%
图 12 原煤和型煤在σ/σc=99%时的Hurst统计量
Figure 12. Hurst statistic at σ/σc=99% for raw coal and briquette
表 1 原煤和型煤的基本力学参数
Table 1. Basic mechanical parameters of raw coal and briquette
煤样类型 试样编号 轴向应
力/MPa弹性模
量/GPa泊松比 密度/
（g·cm−3）原煤 M–01 53.10 13.13 0.54 1.28 M–02 64.98 10.55 0.46 1.32 M–03 59.12 13.84 0.42 1.31 型煤 XM–01 21.46 1.43 0.71 1.08 XM–02 23.05 1.54 0.83 1.12 XM–03 23.16 1.96 0.77 1.16 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 声发射信号的分形结果
Table 2. Fractal results of AE signal
试样编号 Hurst指数 分形维数 相关系数 M–02 0.999 8 1.000 3 0.999 6 M–03 0.999 7 1.000 6 0.999 8 XM–02 0.999 5 1.000 4 0.999 4 XM–03 0.999 6 1.000 7 0.999 5
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 曹树刚,李勇,郭平,等. 型煤与原煤全应力–应变过程渗流特性对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(5):899-906.CAO Shugang,LI Yong,GUO Ping,et al. Comparative research on permeability characteristics in complete stress-strain process of briquettes and coal samples[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(5):899-906. [2] ZHANG Erhui,ZHOU Baokun,LI Ping. Comparative research on the precursory characteristics of critical slowing down before the failure of raw coal and briquettes[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2023,82(9). DOI: 10.1007/s10064-023-03373-3. [3] 陈结,刘博,朱超,等. 基于煤样破坏声发射特征的冲击地压评价预警研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2023,51(2):116-129.CHEN Jie,LIU Bo,ZHU Chao,et al. Early-warning evaluation and warning of rock burst using acoustic emission characteristics of coal sample failure[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(2):116-129. [4] 郭敬远,张玉柱. 煤单轴压缩破坏过程声发射特征分析[J]. 煤炭技术,2021,40(4):129-132.GUO Jingyuan,ZHANG Yuzhu. Analysis on acoustic emission characteristics of coal under uniaxial compression[J]. Coal Technology,2021,40(4):129-132. [5] 李术才,许新骥,刘征宇,等. 单轴压缩条件下砂岩破坏全过程电阻率与声发射响应特征及损伤演化[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(1):14-23.LI Shucai,XU Xinji,LIU Zhengyu,et al. Electrical resistivity and acoustic emission response characteristics and damage evolution of sandstone during whole process of uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,33(1):14-23. [6] 陈结,张允瑞,蒲源源,等. 不同应力路径下含瓦斯煤的声发射特性与能量演化规律[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,54(6):2323-2337.CHEN Jie,ZHANG Yunrui,PU Yuanyuan,et al. Acoustic emission characteristics and energy evolution of coal containing gas under different stress paths[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2023,54(6):2323-2337. [7] 冯志杰,苏发强,苏承东,等. 赵固二_1煤样冲击倾向性与声发射特征的试验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2022,39(1):25-35.FENG Zhijie,SU Faqiang,SU Chengdong,et al. Experimental study on impact proneness and acoustic emission characteristics of coal samples from Zhaogu No.2_1 Mine[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2022,39(1):25-35. [8] ZHOU Xin,LIU Xiaofei,WANG Xiaoran,et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of coal failure under triaxial loading and unloading disturbance[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2022,56(2):1043-1061. [9] 吴永胜,余贤斌. 单轴压缩条件下岩石声发射特性的实验研究[J]. 金属矿山,2008(10):25-28.WU Yongsheng,YU Xianbin. Experimental study on the acoustic emission characteristics of rocks at uniaxial compression[J]. Metal Mine,2008(10):25-28. [10] MORADIAN Z,EINSTEIN H H,BALLIVY G. Detection of cracking levels in brittle rocks by parametric analysis of the acoustic emission signals[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2016,49(3):785-800. doi: 10.1007/s00603-015-0775-1 [11] 杨磊. 不同冲击倾向性煤体声发射能量特征与时空演化规律研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2020,37(3):525-532.YANG Lei. Acoustic emission energy characteristics and time-space evolution law of coal with different rockburst tendency[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2020,37(3):525-532. [12] 杜帅,王炀. 基于声发射幅频分布的大理岩岩爆试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(11):44-49.DU Shuai,WANG Yang. Experimental study on rockburst test of marble based on acoustic emission amplitude-frequency distribution[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(11):44-49. [13] HE M C,MIAO J L,FENG J L. Rock burst process of limestone and its acoustic emission characteristics under true-triaxial unloading conditions[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2010,47(2):286-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.09.003 [14] QI Gang. Wavelet-based AE characterization of composite materials[J]. NDT and E International:Independent Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation,2000,33(3):133-144. [15] KONG Biao,WANG Enyuan,LI Zenghua,et al. Nonlinear characteristics of acoustic emissions during the deformation and fracture of sandstone subjected to thermal treatment[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2016,90:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.10.004 [16] WANG Guilin,WANG Runqiu,SUN Fan,et al. Analysis of nonlinear energy evolution in fractured limestone under uniaxial compression[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics,2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103387. [17] LIU Xiaofei,WANG Xiaoran,WANG Enyuan,et al. Effects of gas pressure on bursting liability of coal under uniaxial conditions[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2017,39:90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.01.033 [18] 谢和平,鞠杨,黎立云,等. 岩体变形破坏过程的能量机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(9):1729-1740.XIE Heping,JU Yang,LI Liyun,et al. Energy mechanism of deformation and failure of rock masses[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2008,27(9):1729-1740. [19] WANG Xiaoran,WANG Enyuan,LIU Xiaofei. Damage characterization of concrete under multi-step loading by integrated ultrasonic and acoustic emission techniques[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2019,221(10):678-690. [20] ISHIDA T,LABUZ J F,MANTHEI G,et al. ISRM suggested method for laboratory acoustic emission monitoring[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2017,50(3):665-674. doi: 10.1007/s00603-016-1165-z [21] 王恩元,何学秋,刘贞堂. 煤岩破裂声发射实验研究及RS统计分析[J]. 煤炭学报,1999,24(3):48-51.WANG Enyuan,HE Xueqiu,LIU Zhentang. Experimental research and R/S statistic analysis of AE during the fracture of coal or rock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,1999,24(3):48-51. [22] 李振雷,李娜,杨菲,等. 声发射梅尔倒谱系数在砂岩破裂分析的应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(2):714-729.LI Zhenlei,LI Na,YANG Fei,et al. Applying Mel-frequency cepstral coefficient of acoustic emission for analyzing fracture and failure of sandstone specimens[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(2):714-729. [23] 李远耀,殷坤龙,程温鸣. R/S分析在滑坡变形趋势预测中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报,2010,32(8):1291-1296.LI Yuanyao,YIN Kunlong,CHENG Wenming. Application of R/S method in forecast of landslide deformation trend[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2010,32(8):1291-1296. [24] WANG J A,SHANG X C,MA H T. Investigation of catastrophic ground collapse in Xingtai gypsum mines in China[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2008,45(8):1480-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.02.012 -
点击查看大图
图(12) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 53
- HTML全文浏览量: 19
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
