Research on lateral-longitudinal coordinated control of unmanned dump trucks in open-pit mine
-
摘要: 露天矿无人驾驶自卸车面临道路等级低且坡道弯道多、车辆载质量大且变化范围宽等恶劣运输工况，现有车辆运动控制策略多面向普通道路环境，无法直接将现有车辆控制策略应用于矿山自卸车。针对上述问题，提出了一种基于预瞄误差与分层反馈的露天矿无人驾驶自卸车横−纵向协同控制系统。横向控制以线性二次型调节器（LQR）为基础，运用前馈控制器降低稳态误差，采用模糊控制器实现自适应调整预瞄距离，以提高路径跟踪控制精度；纵向控制建立分层反馈式纵向速度控制器，分别采用模型预测控制和模糊PID反馈控制，并建立车辆驱动及制动逆向模型，降低自卸车载质量与道路坡度改变对纵向速度追踪的影响。仿真结果表明：① 车辆实际速度和期望速度误差在2%以内，说明自卸车在空载下坡与满载上坡2种工况下的速度跟踪效果能够满足要求。② 由于横−纵向协同控制能够针对路径曲率的不同实时调节车辆速度，在2种工况下，自卸车横−纵向协同控制器相比于单一横向控制都获得了更高的路径跟踪精度，同时也提高了自卸车的操纵稳定性。实验结果表明：① 空载下坡时的横向误差峰值为0.019 9 m，方向误差峰值为0.184 0 rad，误差增大均发生在弯道处，但误差波动范围较小，能够保证试验车对期望路径的跟踪。② 负载上坡时的横向误差峰值为0.016 8 m，方向误差峰值为0.071 4 rad，误差变化趋势与空载下坡试验相反，但误差仍在合理范围内，试验车的跟踪效果良好。③ 2个误差峰值均小于空载下坡试验，验证了不同速度对横向控制精度的影响规律。Abstract: Open-pit mine unmanned dump trucks face harsh transportation conditions, such as low-grade roads with numerous ramps and curves, as well as heavy and highly variable loads. Most existing vehicle motion control strategies are designed for conventional road environments, making them unsuitable for direct application to mine dump trucks. To address these issues, a lateral-longitudinal coordinated control system based on preview error and layered feedback was proposed for unmanned open-pit mine dump trucks. The lateral control was based on a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and employed a feedforward controller to reduce steady-state errors, while a fuzzy controller was used to adaptively adjust the preview distance, thereby improving path tracking accuracy. The longitudinal control established a layered feedback longitudinal speed controller, which used model predictive control and fuzzy proportional-integral-differential (PID) feedback control. In addition, an inverse model for vehicle driving and braking was established to minimize the impact of load and road gradient changes on longitudinal speed tracking. Simulation results indicated that: ① The error between the actual speed and the desired speed was within 2%, demonstrating that the speed tracking performance of the dump truck could meet requirements under both empty downhill and fully loaded uphill conditions. ② Due to the lateral-longitudinal coordinated control’s ability to adjust vehicle speed in real time based on varying road curvature, the coordinated controller achieved higher path tracking accuracy compared to single lateral control in both operating conditions, while also enhancing vehicle maneuverability and stability. Laboratory test results showed that: ① The peak lateral error during empty downhill runs was
0.0199 m, and the peak direction error was0.1840 rad. Both errors increased at curves, but their fluctuations were minimal, ensuring that the test vehicle effectively tracked the desired path. ② During loaded uphill runs, the peak lateral error was0.0168 m, and the peak direction error was0.0714 rad. The error trends were opposite to those observed in empty downhill tests, but the errors remained within acceptable limits, resulting in good path tracking performance. ③ Both peak errors were lower compared to those in empty downhill tests, which validated the effect of varying speeds on lateral control accuracy. -
-
![]()
图 6 自适应模糊控制器输入输出关系曲面
Figure 6. Surface plot of input-output relationship for adaptive fuzzy controller
![]()
图 11 横−纵向协同控制器联合仿真模型
Figure 11. Co-simulation model of latera-longitudinal coordinated controller
![]()
图 12 2种工况下期望速度跟踪误差曲线
Figure 12. Expected speed tracking error curve under two working conditions
![]()
图 13 空载下坡工况路径跟踪主要参数仿真结果
Figure 13. Simulation results of main parameters for path tracking under no-load downhill condition
![]()
图 14 满载上坡工况路径跟踪主要参数仿真结果
Figure 14. Simulation results of main parameters for path tracking under full load uphill condition
表 1 模糊控制规则
Table 1 Fuzzy control rules
vx k k1 k2 k3 k4 k5 k6 k7 v1 l3 l2 l2 l2 l1 l1 l1 v2 l4 l4 l3 l3 l2 l2 l1 v3 l5 l4 l4 l3 l3 l2 l2 v4 l6 l5 l5 l4 l4 l3 l3 v5 l6 l6 l5 l5 l4 l4 l3 v6 l7 l6 l6 l5 l5 l4 l4 v7 l7 l7 l6 l6 l5 l5 l4 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 自卸车仿真参数
Table 2 Simulation parameters of dump truck
车辆参数 数值 车辆质量/kg 30000 额定载质量/kg 60000 发动机功率/rpm 338/ 2100 质心距前轴的距离/m 1.385 质心距前轴的距离/m 3.75
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 模型试验车基本参数
Table 3 Basic parameters of model test vehicle
类型 参数名称 数值 车辆参数 尺寸/mm×mm×mm 240.5×191×146 轮距/m 0.16 轴距/m 0.142 整车质量/kg 1.8 驱动电动机 额定功率/W 4.32 额定扭矩/（kg·m） 1 舵机 最大角度/（°） 180 扭矩/（kg·cm） 15.3～20 惯性测量单元 陀螺仪量程/（（°）·s−1） ±150/500/1 000/2 000 加速度量程 ±2g/4g/8g/16g 罗盘量程/μT ±4 800 单线激光雷达 扫描角度/（°） 0~360 扫描频率/Hz 5.5 主控制器 CPU ARM Cortex A57 64 bit@1.43 GHz GPU 128−core Maxwell@921 MHz 内存/(GiB·s−1) 4 GiB 64 bit LPDDR4 |25.6
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] NEBOT E M. Surface mining:main research issues for autonomous operations[M]. Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2007:268-280.
[2] 钱建生,胡青松. 智能煤矿建设路线与工程实践[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2020,48(7):109-117. QIAN Jiansheng,HU Qingsong. Construction routes and practice of intelligent coal mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2020,48(7):109-117.
[3] 鲍久圣,刘琴,葛世荣,等. 矿山运输装备智能化技术研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 智能矿山,2020,1(1):78-88. BAO Jiusheng,LIU Qin,GE Shirong,et al. Research status and development trend of intelligent technologies for mine transportation equipment[J]. Journal of Intelligent Mine,2020,1(1):78-88.
[4] 鲍久圣,张牧野,葛世荣,等. 基于改进A*和人工势场算法的无轨胶轮车井下无人驾驶路径规划[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(3):1347-1360. BAO Jiusheng,ZHANG Muye,GE Shirong,et al. Underground driverless path planning of trackless rubber tyred vehicle based on improved A* and artificial potential field algorithm[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(3):1347-1360.
[5] 李庆玲,张慧祥,赵旭阳,等. 露天矿无人驾驶自卸卡车发展综述[J]. 煤炭工程,2021,53(2):29-34. LI Qingling,ZHANG Huixiang,ZHAO Xuyang, et al. Overview of unmanned mining trucks in open-pit mine[J]. Coal Engineering,2021,53(2):29-34.
[6] 唐传茵,赵懿峰,赵亚峰,等. 智能车辆轨迹跟踪控制方法研究[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(9):1297-1303. TANG Chuanyin,ZHAO Yifeng,ZHAO Yafeng,et al. Research on the trajectory tracking control method of intelligent vehicles[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science),2020,41(9):1297-1303.
[7] 闫凌,黄佳德. 矿用卡车无人驾驶系统研究[J]. 工矿自动化,2021,47(4):19-29. YAN Ling,HUANG Jiade. Research on unmanned driving system of mine-used truck[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2021,47(4):19-29.
[8] 周琳. 履带车辆路径规划与轨迹跟踪控制方法研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2020. ZHOU Lin. Research on path planning and trajectory tracking control method of tracked vehicle[D]. Changchun:Jilin University,2020.
[9] ZHOU Hongliang,JIA Fengjiao,JING Houhua,et al. Coordinated longitudinal and lateral motion control for four wheel independent motor-drive electric vehicle[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,2018,67(5):3782-3790. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2816936
[10] 熊璐,杨兴,卓桂荣,等. 无人驾驶车辆的运动控制发展现状综述[J]. 机械工程学报,2020,56(10):127-143. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2020.10.127 XIONG Lu,YANG Xing,ZHUO Guirong,et al. Review on motion control of autonomous vehicles[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2020,56(10):127-143. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2020.10.127
[11] ZIEGLER J,BENDER P,SCHREIBER M,et al. Making bertha drive-an autonomous journey on a historic route[J]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine,2014,6(2):8-20. DOI: 10.1109/MITS.2014.2306552
[12] XU Shaobing,PENG Huei. Design,analysis,and experiments of preview path tracking control for autonomous vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2020,21(1):48-58. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2892926
[13] WANG Jianqiang,ZHANG Lei,ZHANG Dezhao,et al. An adaptive longitudinal driving assistance system based on driver characteristics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2013,14(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2012.2205143
[14] ZHU Qi,HUANG Zhenhua,LIU Daxue,et al. An adaptive path tracking method for autonomous land vehicle based on neural dynamic programming[C]. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation,Harbin,2016:1429-1434.
[15] 谭宇航. 基于MFAPC的智能车辆跟随式自动驾驶纵向加速度控制算法[J]. 汽车实用技术,2023,48(9):59-65. TAN Yuhang. Longitudinal acceleration control of intelligent vehicle following autonomous driving based on MFAPC[J]. Automobile Applied Technology,2023,48(9):59-65.
[16] 周红梅,胡广地,崔然滔,等. 基于模型预测控制的智能车辆横纵向综合控制研究[J]. 机械,2023,50(6):15-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0316.2023.06.003 ZHOU Hongmei,HU Guangdi,CUI Rantao,et al. Longitudinal and lateral integrated control of intelligent vehicle based on model predictive control[J]. Machinery,2023,50(6):15-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0316.2023.06.003
[17] RAJAMANI R,TAN H S,LAW B K,et al. Demonstration of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for the operation of automated vehicles in platoons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,2000,8(4):695-708. DOI: 10.1109/87.852914
[18] 邓涛,李鑫. 智能车辆横纵向运动综合控制方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2021,40(4):133-140. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.04.20 DENG Tao,LI Xin. Combined control method of intelligent vehicle longitudinal and lateral motion[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science),2021,40(4):133-140. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.04.20
[19] 郭景华,罗禹贡,李克强. 智能电动车辆横纵向协调与重构控制[J]. 控制理论与应用,2014,31(9):1238-1244. DOI: 10.7641/CTA.2014.30863 GUO Jinghua,LUO Yugong,LI Keqiang. Cooperative and reconfigurable lateral and longitudinal control of intelligent electric vehicles[J]. Control Theory & Applications,2014,31(9):1238-1244. DOI: 10.7641/CTA.2014.30863
[20] 邹学耀. 露天矿无人驾驶自卸车横-纵向协同控制方法研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2022. ZOU Xueyao. Research on horizontal-vertical cooperative control method of unmanned dump truck in open-pit mine[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2022.
[21] 王陈,鲍久圣,袁晓明,等. 无轨胶轮车井下无人驾驶系统设计及控制策略研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(S1):520-528. WANG Chen,BAO Jiusheng,YUAN Xiaoming,et al. Design and control strategy of underground driverless system for trackless rubber tire vehicle[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(S1):520-528.
[22] 余米森,钱玉宝,黄华宝,等. 连续工况下基于PID+LQR算法的自动驾驶车辆横纵向耦合控制[J]. 科学技术与工程,2022,22(30):13490-13496. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.30.043 YU Misen,QIAN Yubao,HUANG Huabao,et al. Lateral and longitudinal coupling control of autonomous vehicle based on PID+LQR algorithm under continuous conditions[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2022,22(30):13490-13496. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.30.043
计量
- 文章访问数: 512
- HTML全文浏览量: 44
- PDF下载量: 27
