留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

低信噪比矿井提升机振动信号融合去噪算法

王厚超 牛强 陈朋朋 夏士雄

王厚超,牛强,陈朋朋,等. 低信噪比矿井提升机振动信号融合去噪算法[J]. 工矿自动化,2023,49(1):63-72.  doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18019
引用本文: 王厚超,牛强,陈朋朋,等. 低信噪比矿井提升机振动信号融合去噪算法[J]. 工矿自动化,2023,49(1):63-72.  doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18019
WANG Houchao, NIU Qiang, CHEN Pengpeng, et al. Fusion denoising algorithm for vibration signal of mine hoist with low signal-to-noise ratio[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(1):63-72.  doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18019
Citation: WANG Houchao, NIU Qiang, CHEN Pengpeng, et al. Fusion denoising algorithm for vibration signal of mine hoist with low signal-to-noise ratio[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(1):63-72.  doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18019

低信噪比矿井提升机振动信号融合去噪算法

doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18019
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51674255)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王厚超(1996—),男,江苏徐州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为智能化状态监测和故障诊断,E-mail:TS20170100P31@cumt.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    牛强(1974—),男,辽宁沈阳人,教授,博士研究生导师, 研究方向为人工智能、数据挖掘和无线传感器网络,E-mail:niuq@cumt.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TD632

Fusion denoising algorithm for vibration signal of mine hoist with low signal-to-noise ratio

  • 摘要: 针对矿井复杂环境下提升机振动信号非线性、低信噪比的特点,提出了一种基于总体平均经验模态分解(CEEMDAN)和自适应小波阈值的矿井提升机振动信号融合去噪算法。首先,采用CEEMDAN算法对含噪的矿井提升机振动信号进行分解,得到本征模态分量(IMF)和残差,对IMF分量进行高低频判断,采用t检验方法对该均值是否显著区别于0进行检验,趋于0的IMF分量为高频分量,显著区别于0的IMF分量为低频分量。然后,选取合适的小波基函数及分解层数,结合自适应小波阈值方法对高频IMF分量进行去噪处理。最后,将处理后的高频IMF分量和未处理的低频IMF分量与残差重构,得到融合算法去噪后的振动信号。分别采用CEEMDAN去噪算法、CEEMD−小波阈值联合去噪算法、CEEMDAN−小波阈值联合去噪算法和CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法对仿真信号进行去噪处理,结果表明:① CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法去噪后的信号在局部波形特征和信号峰值上与原始信号相似度较高,信号波形的一些特征得到了很好的复原,在去噪过程中很好地保留了原始信号的特征信息。② 采用复合评价指标H作为客观评价标准,CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法的H值最小,说明融合去噪算法对于仿真信号的去噪效果要优于其他几种去噪算法的去噪效果。在黑龙江某矿正在运行的矿井提升机上进行试验,结果表明:① 采用db4小波基函数对含噪IMF分量进行4层分解,CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法去噪后的信号比较光滑,信号的一些波形特征也得到了很好的复原,在剔除噪声的同时,最大程度上保留了原有信号的特征信息。② 在实际矿井提升机振动信号的去噪过程中,CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法的H值最小,去噪效果最佳。

     

  • 图  1  阈值函数特性对比

    Figure  1.  Threshold function characteristic comparison

    图  2  CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法流程

    Figure  2.  CEEMDAN adaptive wavelet threshold fusion denoising method flowchart

    图  3  仿真信号的时域波形

    Figure  3.  Time domain waveform of the simulated signal

    图  4  CEEMDAN分解

    Figure  4.  CEEMDAN decomposition

    图  5  原始信号

    Figure  5.  Primary signal

    图  6  CEEMDAN去噪信号

    Figure  6.  CEEMDAN denoising signal

    图  7  CEEMD−小波阈值联合去噪信号

    Figure  7.  CEEMD-wavelet threshold combined denoising signal

    图  8  CEEMDAN−小波阈值联合去噪信号

    Figure  8.  CEEMDAN-wavelet threshold combined denoising signal

    图  9  CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪信号

    Figure  9.  CEEMDAN-adaptive wavelet threshold fusim denoising signal

    图  10  矿井提升机和数据采集系统

    Figure  10.  Mine hoist and a data acquisition system

    图  11  原始振动信号的时域波形

    Figure  11.  Time-domain waveform of the original vibrational signal

    图  12  CEEMDAN分解

    Figure  12.  CEEMDAN decomposition

    图  13  IMF分量自适应小波阈值小波去噪后的时域波形

    Figure  13.  Time-domain waveforms of IMF components after adaptive threshold wavelet denoising

    图  14  CEEMDAN算法去噪后的信号

    Figure  14.  Signal after denoising by CEEMDAN method

    图  15  CEEMD−小波阈值联合去噪后的信号

    Figure  15.  Signal after CEEMD-wavelet threshold combined denoising

    图  16  CEEMDAN−小波阈值联合去噪后的信号

    Figure  16.  Signal after CEEMDAN-wavelet threshold combined denoising

    图  17  CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪后的信号

    Figure  17.  Signal after CEEMDAN-adaptive wavelet threshold fusion denoising

    图  18  4种不同算法的去噪结果

    Figure  18.  Denoising results of four different methods

    表  1  不同去噪方法的去噪性能对比

    Table  1.   Comparison of denoising performance of different denoising methods

    去噪算法H
    CEEMDAN去噪算法0.916 5
    CEEMD−小波阈值联合去噪算法0.848 2
    CEEMDAN−小波阈值联合去噪算法0.878 5
    CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法0.777 3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同小波基函数去噪效果对比

    Table  2.   Comparison of denoising effects of different wavelet basis functions

    db小波系sym 小波系coif 小波系bior小波系
    dbNHsymNHcoifNHbior Nr.NdH
    db10.728 3sym10.821 9coif10.564 2bior1.10.756 4
    db20.298 5sym20.785 6coif20.273 5bior1.30.687 5
    db30.142 8sym30.567 5coif30.198 6bior1.50.453 8
    db40.129 7sym40.398 2coif40.198 6bior2.40.256 7
    db50.130 6sym50.266 4bior3.50.157 8
    db60.132 9sym60.138 6bior3.90.264 5
    db70.137 8sym70.142 7bior4.40.389 5
    db80.256 5sym80.159 6bior5.50.563 7
    bior6.80.765 9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同分解层数去噪效果对比

    Table  3.   Comparison of denoising effects of different decomposition layers

    分解层数H
    db4sym6coif3bior3.5
    10.897 80.922 50.908 40.857 6
    20.685 60.758 60.698 50.725 6
    30.232 90.276 50.265 30.298 5
    40.129 60.139 50.198 60.159 6
    50.129 80.138 60.198 90.157 8
    60.132 50.139 20.199 40.156 9
    70.132 70.139 70.212 50.157 9
    80.132 90.140 20.258 60.159 3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同去噪算法的去噪性能对比

    Table  4.   Comparison of denoising performance of different denoising methods

    去噪算法H
    CEEMDAN去噪算法0.232 7
    CEEMD−小波阈值联合去噪算法0.185 4
    CEEMDAN−小波阈值联合去噪算法0.178 3
    CEEMDAN−自适应小波阈值融合去噪算法0.155 6
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 夏战国,夏士雄,蔡世玉,等. 类不均衡的半监督高斯过程分类算法[J]. 通信学报,2013,34(5):42-51.

    XIA Zhanguo,XIA Shixiong,CAI Shiyu,et al. Semi-supervised gaussian process classification algorithm addressing the class imbalance[J]. Journal on Communications,2013,34(5):42-51.
    [2] YE Hanmin, LYU Hao, SUN Qianting. An improved semi-supervised K-means clustering algorithm[C]. IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Chongqing, 2016, 71-74.
    [3] TORRES M E, COLOMINAS M A, SCHLOTTHAUER G, et al. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise[C]. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Prague, 2011: 4144-4147.
    [4] 罗小燕,卢小江,熊洋,等. 小波分析球磨机轴承振动信号特征提取方法[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2016,36(1):148-152.

    LUO Xiaoyan,LU Xiaojiang,XIONG Yang,et al. Feature extraction method for ball-mill bearing's vibration signals using wavelet analysis[J]. Noise and Vibration Control,2016,36(1):148-152.
    [5] TIJANI I A,ABDELMAGEED S,FARES A,et al. Improving the leak detection efficiency in water distribution networks using noise loggers[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,821:153530. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153530
    [6] BARBOSH M,SINGH P,SADHU A. Empirical mode decomposition and its variants:a review with applications in structural health monitoring[J]. Smart Materials and Structures,2020,29(9):1-45.
    [7] JIN Tao,LI Qiangguang,MOHAMED M A. A novel adaptive EEMD method for switchgear partial discharge signal denoising[J]. IEEE Access,2019,7:58139-58147. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2914064
    [8] FAN Jiang,ZHU Zhencai,LI Wei,et al. Lifting load monitoring of mine hoist through vibration signal analysis with variational mode decomposition[J]. Journal of Vibroengineering,2017,19(8):6021-6035. doi: 10.21595/jve.2017.18859
    [9] 张振凤,威欢,谭博文. 一种改进的小波阈值去噪方法[J]. 光通信研究,2018(2):75-78.

    ZHANG Zhenfeng,WEI Huan,TAN Bowen. An improved wavelet threshold denoising method[J]. Study on Optical Communications,2018(2):75-78.
    [10] 林金朝,刘乐乐,李国权,等. 基于改进EEMD的心电信号基线漂移消除方法[J]. 数据采集与处理,2018,33(5):880-890.

    LIN Jinzhao,LIU Lele,LI Guoquan,et al. A method for removing baseline drift in ECG signal based on improved EEMD[J]. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing,2018,33(5):880-890.
    [11] 张宁,刘友文. 基于 CEEMDAN 改进阈值滤波的微机电陀螺信号去噪模型[J]. 中国惯性技术学报,2018,26(5):665-669.

    ZHANG Ning,LIU Youwen. Signal denoising model for MEMS gyro based on CEEMDAN improved threshold filtering[J]. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology,2018,26(5):665-669.
    [12] JUNIOR P O,FRIMPONG S,ADAM A M,et al. COVID-19 as information transmitter to global equity markets:evidence from CEEMDAN-based transfer entropy approach[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2021(2):1-19.
    [13] LU Jingyi,LIN Hong,YE Dong,et al. A new wavelet threshold function and denoising application[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2016(5):1-8.
    [14] SZEGEDY C, LIU Wei, JIA Yangqing, et al. Going deeper with convolutions[C]. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), Boston, 2015: 1-9.
    [15] ZHANG Xin,GU Hongbin,ZHOU Lai,et al. Improved dual-domain filtering and threshold function denoising method for ultrasound images based on non-subsampled contourlet transform[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics,2017,7(7):1624-1628. doi: 10.1166/jmihi.2017.2176
    [16] JIA Hairong,ZHANG Xueying,BAI Jing. A continuous differentiable wavelet threshold function for speech enhancement[J]. Journal of Central South University,2013,20(8):2219-2225. doi: 10.1007/s11771-013-1727-0
    [17] SU Li, ZHAO Guoliang, ZHANG Renyan. Translation-invariant wavelet de-noising method with improved thresholding[C]. IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technology, Beijing, 2005, 619-622.
    [18] CAO Jian,LI Zhi,LI Jian. Financial time series forecasting model based on CEEMDAN and LSTM[J]. Physica A:Statistical mechanics and its applications,2019,519:127-139. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.11.061
    [19] 朱建军,章浙涛,匡翠林,等. 一种可靠的小波去噪质量评价指标[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2015,40(5):688-694.

    ZHU Jianjun,ZHANG Zhetao,KUANG Cuilin,et al. A reliable evaluation indicator of wavelet de-noising[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2015,40(5):688-694.
    [20] GIRI R, ISIK U, KRISHNASWAMY A. Attention wave-u-net for speech enhancement[C]. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), New Paltz, 2019: 249-253.
    [21] AHROUM RIDA, ACHCHAB BOUJEMA. Harvesting Islamic risk premium with long-short strategies: a time scale decomposition using the wavelet theory[J]. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2019, 26(1): 430-444.
    [22] XIE Zhijie,SONG Baoyu,ZHANG Yang,et al. Application of an improved wavelet threshold denoising method for vibration signal processing[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2014:799-806.
    [23] YANG Hong,CHENG Yuanxun,LI Guohui. A denoising method for ship radiated noise based on Spearman variational mode decomposition,spatial-dependence recurrence sample entropy,improved wavelet threshold denoising,and Savitzky-Golay filter[J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal,2021,60(3):3379-3400. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.055
  • 加载中
图(18) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  175
  • HTML全文浏览量:  43
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-08-25
  • 修回日期:  2023-01-03
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-01-11

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回